linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the input-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 26 Jan 2019 10:16:25 +0100
From:   Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the input-current tree

On Fri, 2019-01-25 at 15:58 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:56 PM Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 3:09 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > Hi Dmitry,
> > > 
> > > In commit
> > > 
> > >   ec87da107d11 ("Input: olpc_apsp - assign priv->dev earlier")
> > > 
> > > Fixes tag
> > > 
> > >   Fixes: commit af518342effd ("Input: olpc_apsp - check FIFO status on open(), not probe()")
> > > 
> > > has these problem(s):
> > > 
> > >   - No SHA1 recognised
> > > 
> > > The "commit" at the start of the tag value was unexpected.
> > 
> > Hmm, this is really weird:
> > 
> > dtor@...r-ws:~/kernel/master (for-linus)$ git log --oneline --
> > drivers/input/serio/olpc_apsp.c
> > ec87da107d11 Input: olpc_apsp - assign priv->dev earlier
> > 2a58dd767bf9 Input: olpc_apsp - remove set but not used variable 'np'
> > ed22cee91a88 Input: olpc_apsp - enable the SP clock
> > af518342effd Input: olpc_apsp - check FIFO status on open(), not probe()
> > 
> > As you can see there is that SHA1 in question present in my for-linus branch.
> 
> Argh, I see what you mean, the word "commit" should be omitted. Oh
> well, it's in the branch that I loath to rebase, so it will have to
> stay as is.

Sorry for this. I included the word "commit" because checkpatch.pl
actually complains when it's missing when a commit is referenced
outside the tags in the commit message.

I actually did a quick search for /Fixes: commit/ in the git log at the
time, but apparently it's a common mistake to make...

Perhaps I can see if I can teach checkpatch.pl to warn about this in
future.

Lubo