linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Mark expected switch fall-through

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 26 Jan 2019 08:05:28 -0600
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Mark expected switch fall-through

Boris,

On 1/26/19 3:47 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 02:55:20PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warning:
>>
>> arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c: In function ‘resolve_default_seg’:
>> arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c:179:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>    if (insn->addr_bytes == 2)
>>       ^
>> arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c:182:2: note: here
>>   case -EDOM:
>>   ^~~~
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
> 
> For the future:
> 
> Avoid having "This patch" or "This commit" in the commit message. It is
> tautologically useless.
> 
> Also, do
> 
> $ git grep 'This patch' Documentation/process
> 
> for more details.
> 

I've got it.

Thanks for the feedback.

--
Gustavo