[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed29b63e-66fe-1c8e-ec63-2f01ba096b90@embeddedor.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 08:05:28 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/insn-eval: Mark expected switch fall-through
Boris,
On 1/26/19 3:47 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 02:55:20PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warning:
>>
>> arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c: In function ‘resolve_default_seg’:
>> arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c:179:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> if (insn->addr_bytes == 2)
>> ^
>> arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c:182:2: note: here
>> case -EDOM:
>> ^~~~
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
>
> For the future:
>
> Avoid having "This patch" or "This commit" in the commit message. It is
> tautologically useless.
>
> Also, do
>
> $ git grep 'This patch' Documentation/process
>
> for more details.
>
I've got it.
Thanks for the feedback.
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists