linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ASoC: add fsl_audmix DT binding documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:49:19 -0800
From:   Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To:     Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
        Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        Cosmin Samoila <cosmin.samoila@....com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ASoC: add fsl_audmix DT binding documentation

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:46:29PM +0000, Viorel Suman wrote:

> +  - dais		: Must contain a list of phandles to AUDMIX connected
> +			  DAIs. The current implementation requires two phandles
> +			  to SAI interfaces to be provided, the first SAI in the
> +			  list being used to route the AUDMIX output.

Another small thing, that I just noticed, is this list. It forces
the first input source to be the output source without giving any
chance. I feel that we could have some flexibility here: one node
for two input sources, and one node for the output source.

Well, there is no critical problem with the current binding since
it follows the SoC design. Yet I doubt if this routing logic will
never break.

Any suggestion, Rob?