lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:46:48 +0530
From:   Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
        linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64-amarula-relic: Add STLM75 sensor

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 2:10 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:22:54PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > Amarula A64 Relic has STLM75 sensor for digital temperature
> > and thermal watchdog.
> >
> > Add support for it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
> > ---
> > Note: the respective driver change is already in mainline
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=2e9a41bbc1079776dabe42ed8113b086b99ae56c
> >
> >  .../dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-amarula-relic.dts    | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-amarula-relic.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-amarula-relic.dts
> > index 6cb2b7f0c817..5d942543d978 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-amarula-relic.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-amarula-relic.dts
> > @@ -34,6 +34,21 @@
> >       status = "okay";
> >  };
> >
> > +&i2c0 {
> > +     pinctrl-names = "default";
> > +     pinctrl-0 = <&i2c0_pins>;
> > +     status = "okay";
> > +
> > +     temp@48 {
>
> That would be sensor@48
>
> > +             compatible = "st,stlm75";
>
> That compatible isn't documented.

True, but none of the compatible strings used on the driver doesn't
documented in binding instead there are documented in
Documentation/hwmon/lm75.

Don't know the exact reason, do we need to document this in binding as well?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ