linux-kernel - Re: [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH v2] ipmi_si: fix use-after-free of resource->name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:36:23 -0600
From:   Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
To:     Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Cc:     arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, qiaonuohan@...wei.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH v2] ipmi_si: fix use-after-free of
 resource->name

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:53:30AM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2019/1/26 23:08, Corey Minyard wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 05:14:54PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> > > When we excute the following commands, we got oops
> > > rmmod ipmi_si
> > > cat /proc/ioports
> > > 
> > snip..
> > 
> > > If io_setup is called successful in try_smi_init() but try_smi_init()
> > > goes out_err before calling ipmi_register_smi(), so ipmi_unregister_smi()
> > > will not be called while removing module. It leads to the resource that
> > > allocated in io_setup() can not be freed, but the name(DEVICE_NAME) of
> > > resource is freed while removing the module. It causes use-after-free
> > > when cat /proc/ioports.
> > > 
> > > Fix this by calling io_cleanup() while try_smi_init() goes to out_err
> > > and don't call release_region() if request_region() is not called to
> > > avoid error prints.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 93c303d2045b ("ipmi_si: Clean up shutdown a bit")
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > Reported-by: NuoHan Qiao <qiaonuohan@...wei.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c    | 5 +++++
> > >   drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c | 3 +++
> > >   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> > > index dc8603d..f1b9fda 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> > > @@ -2085,6 +2085,11 @@ static int try_smi_init(struct smi_info *new_smi)
> > >   	WARN_ON(new_smi->io.dev->init_name != NULL);
> > >    out_err:
> > > +	if (rv && new_smi->io.io_cleanup) {
> > > +		new_smi->io.io_cleanup(&new_smi->io);
> > > +		new_smi->io.io_cleanup = NULL;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > >   	kfree(init_name);
> > >   	return rv;
> > >   }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> > > index ef6dffc..0c46a3f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> > > @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ static void port_cleanup(struct si_sm_io *io)
> > >   	unsigned int addr = io->addr_data;
> > >   	int          idx;
> > > +	if (io->regsize != 1 && io->regsize != 2 && io->regsize != 4)
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > Why do you need this part?  I can't see the reason for it.  The addr
> > part below should handle that, especially with the above change.
> > 
> > -corey
> If ipmi_si_port_setup() returns in default case, request_region() won't be
> called,
> so we don't need to call release_region() or it will prints some warning
> messages like
> this "Trying to free nonexistent resource...".
> 
> We don't need call io_cleanup() until the io_setup() returns successful.
> How about change this part like this:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> index ef6dffc..03924c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> @@ -68,8 +68,6 @@ int ipmi_si_port_setup(struct si_sm_io *io)
>         if (!addr)
>                 return -ENODEV;
> 
> -       io->io_cleanup = port_cleanup;
> -
>         /*
>          * Figure out the actual inb/inw/inl/etc routine to use based
>          * upon the register size.
> @@ -109,5 +107,8 @@ int ipmi_si_port_setup(struct si_sm_io *io)
>                         return -EIO;
>                 }
>         }
> +
> +       io->io_cleanup = port_cleanup;
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
> 
> Thanks,
> Yang

That, I believe, is the right fix.  Same thing for memory I/O, too.

Thanks,

-corey

> > 
> > >   	if (addr) {
> > >   		for (idx = 0; idx < io->io_size; idx++)
> > >   			release_region(addr + idx * io->regspacing,
> > > -- 
> > > 1.8.3
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openipmi-developer mailing list
> > > Openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
> > .
> > 
> 
>