[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jL8GHE3XLLo36Ldej3Z6ZHg+kN5Jfq-Pepvu3hzNsf52A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 20:58:36 +1300
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: Actually sleep for 1/10th second
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 8:37 AM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
> So this test has been broken? If so, do you know for how long? Or
> who's monitoring them? Either way, thanks for noticing and fixing.
No, it's been working fine. It just consumes 100% cpu during the
spin-wait. The intention was to sleep for a little bit to avoid a
tight loop. It was just resource-inefficient.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists