linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm, memory_hotplug: fix uninitialized pages fallouts.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190128095054.4103093dec81f1c904df7929@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Jan 2019 09:50:54 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
        gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm, memory_hotplug: fix uninitialized pages
 fallouts.

On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:45:04 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:

> Mikhail has posted fixes for the two bugs quite some time ago [1]. I
> have pushed back on those fixes because I believed that it is much
> better to plug the problem at the initialization time rather than play
> whack-a-mole all over the hotplug code and find all the places which
> expect the full memory section to be initialized. We have ended up with
> 2830bf6f05fb ("mm, memory_hotplug: initialize struct pages for the full
> memory section") merged and cause a regression [2][3]. The reason is
> that there might be memory layouts when two NUMA nodes share the same
> memory section so the merged fix is simply incorrect.
> 
> In order to plug this hole we really have to be zone range aware in
> those handlers. I have split up the original patch into two. One is
> unchanged (patch 2) and I took a different approach for `removable'
> crash. It would be great if Mikhail could test it still works for his
> memory layout.
> 
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105150401.97287-2-zaslonko@linux.ibm.com
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666948
> [3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190125163938.GA20411@dhcp22.suse.cz

Any thoughts on which kernel version(s) need these patches?