[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c32b4041-14a6-afb1-8730-0ed9f7120592@embeddedor.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:23:35 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Miquel, Boris,
On 1/28/19 3:13 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org> wrote on Sat, 26 Jan 2019
> 17:54:29 +0100:
>
>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 07:48:50 -0600
>> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Boris,
>>>
>>> On 1/26/19 3:52 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:09:50 -0600
>>>> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
>>>>> index 933d1a629c51..d33e15dc4cdc 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
>>>>> @@ -2251,9 +2251,10 @@ static int __init ns_init_module(void)
>>>>>
>>>>> switch (bbt) {
>>>>> case 2:
>>>>> - chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_NO_OOB;
>>>>> + chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_NO_OOB;
>>>>> + /* fall through */
>>>>> case 1:
>>>>> - chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
>>>>> + chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
>>>>
>>>> You miss a '/* fall through */' here.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not really. Notice that in this case the code falls through
>>> to a break statement.
>>
>> Still find it weird to mandate fall through comments in all cases but
>> this one...
>
> Yes please, even if there is no GCC warning I think you can add one
> here.
>
Yep. I get your point.
I've just sent v2: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1036251/
Thanks for the feedback.
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists