lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <316f99df-257a-c981-1a44-464c797e56bb@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:41:04 -0500
From:   "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, acme@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
        namhyung@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 05/12] perf mem: Clean up output format and sort order
 string



On 1/28/2019 10:09 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 07:15:23AM -0800, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> Now, "--phys-data" is the only option which impacts the output format
>> and sort order. A simple "if else" is enough to handle the option.
>> But there will be more options added, e.g. "--data-page-size", which
>> also impact the output format and sort order. The code will become too
>> complex to be maintained.
>>
>> Divide the big printf into several small pieces. Output the specific
>> piece only if the related option is applied.
>>
>> Divide the big sort order string into several small pieces as well.
>> Appends specific sort string only if the related option is applied.
>>
>> No functional change.
> 
> 
> hum, I'm getting some functional changes:
> 
>    # perf mem record
>    # perf.old mem report --stdio > base
>    # perf mem report --stdio > new
>    # diff -puw base new
>    --- base        2019-01-28 16:06:13.264991170 +0100
>    +++ new 2019-01-28 16:06:31.347680820 +0100
>    @@ -5,8133 +5,7346 @@
>     #
>     # Samples: 3K of event 'cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P'
>     # Total weight : 203677
>    -# Sort order   : local_weight,mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,dso_daddr,snoop,tlb,locked
>    +# Sort order   : mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,dso_daddr,tlb,locked,ipc_null
>     #
>    -# Overhead       Samples  Local Weight  Memory access             Symbol                                     Shared Object     Data Symbol                                        Data Object                    Snoop         TLB access              Locked
>    -# ........  ............  ............  ........................  .........................................  ................  .................................................  .............................  ............  ......................  ......
>    +# Overhead       Samples  Memory access             Symbol                                     Shared Object     Data Symbol                                        Data Object                    TLB access              Locked  IPC   [IPC Coverage]
>    +# ........  ............  ........................  .........................................  ................  .................................................  .............................  ......................  ......  ....................
> 
> 
> could you please split this patch to separate simple changes?
>

Thanks for the test. I will fix it and split the patch in V3.

Thanks,
Kan

> jirka
> 
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> No changes since V1
>>
>>   tools/perf/builtin-mem.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>>   tools/perf/util/sort.h   |   2 +
>>   2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
>> index 57393e9..6048fca 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>   #include "util/mem-events.h"
>>   #include "util/debug.h"
>>   #include "util/symbol.h"
>> +#include "util/sort.h"
>>   
>>   #define MEM_OPERATION_LOAD	0x1
>>   #define MEM_OPERATION_STORE	0x2
>> @@ -153,7 +154,7 @@ dump_raw_samples(struct perf_tool *tool,
>>   {
>>   	struct perf_mem *mem = container_of(tool, struct perf_mem, tool);
>>   	struct addr_location al;
>> -	const char *fmt;
>> +	const char *fmt, *field_sep;
>>   
>>   	if (machine__resolve(machine, &al, sample) < 0) {
>>   		fprintf(stderr, "problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
>> @@ -167,60 +168,45 @@ dump_raw_samples(struct perf_tool *tool,
>>   	if (al.map != NULL)
>>   		al.map->dso->hit = 1;
>>   
>> -	if (mem->phys_addr) {
>> -		if (symbol_conf.field_sep) {
>> -			fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%016"PRIx64
>> -			      "%s%"PRIu64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
>> -		} else {
>> -			fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64
>> -			      "%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64
>> -			      "%s%s:%s\n";
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
>> -		}
>> -
>> -		printf(fmt,
>> -			sample->pid,
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> -			sample->tid,
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> -			sample->ip,
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> -			sample->addr,
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> -			sample->phys_addr,
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> -			sample->weight,
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> -			sample->data_src,
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> -			al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
>> -			al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
>> +	field_sep = symbol_conf.field_sep;
>> +	if (field_sep) {
>> +		fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s";
>>   	} else {
>> -		if (symbol_conf.field_sep) {
>> -			fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%"PRIu64
>> -			      "%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
>> -		} else {
>> -			fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64
>> -			      "%s%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
>> -		}
>> +		fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64"%s";
>> +		symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
>> +	}
>> +	printf(fmt,
>> +		sample->pid,
>> +		symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> +		sample->tid,
>> +		symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> +		sample->ip,
>> +		symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> +		sample->addr,
>> +		symbol_conf.field_sep);
>>   
>> +	if (mem->phys_addr) {
>> +		if (field_sep)
>> +			fmt = "0x%"PRIx64"%s";
>> +		else
>> +			fmt = "0x%016"PRIx64"%s";
>>   		printf(fmt,
>> -			sample->pid,
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> -			sample->tid,
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> -			sample->ip,
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> -			sample->addr,
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> -			sample->weight,
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> -			sample->data_src,
>> -			symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> -			al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
>> -			al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
>> +			sample->phys_addr,
>> +			symbol_conf.field_sep);
>>   	}
>> +
>> +	if (field_sep)
>> +		fmt = "%"PRIu64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
>> +	else
>> +		fmt = "%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
>> +
>> +	printf(fmt,
>> +		sample->weight,
>> +		symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> +		sample->data_src,
>> +		symbol_conf.field_sep,
>> +		al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
>> +		al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
>>   out_put:
>>   	addr_location__put(&al);
>>   	return 0;
>> @@ -262,10 +248,12 @@ static int report_raw_events(struct perf_mem *mem)
>>   	if (ret < 0)
>>   		goto out_delete;
>>   
>> +	printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, ");
>> +
>>   	if (mem->phys_addr)
>> -		printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, PHYS ADDR, LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
>> -	else
>> -		printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
>> +		printf("PHYS ADDR, ");
>> +
>> +	printf("LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
>>   
>>   	ret = perf_session__process_events(session);
>>   
>> @@ -273,11 +261,30 @@ static int report_raw_events(struct perf_mem *mem)
>>   	perf_session__delete(session);
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>> +static char *get_sort_order(struct perf_mem *mem)
>> +{
>> +	char sort[MAX_SORT_ORDER_STR];
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * there is no weight (cost) associated with stores, so don't print
>> +	 * the column
>> +	 */
>> +	if (mem->operation & MEM_OPERATION_STORE)
>> +		strcpy(sort, "--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,dso_daddr,tlb,locked");
>> +	else
>> +		strcpy(sort, default_mem_sort_order);
>> +
>> +	if (mem->phys_addr)
>> +		strcat(sort, ",phys_daddr");
>> +
>> +	return strdup(sort);
>> +}
>>   
>>   static int report_events(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
>>   {
>>   	const char **rep_argv;
>>   	int ret, i = 0, j, rep_argc;
>> +	char *new_sort_order;
>>   
>>   	if (mem->dump_raw)
>>   		return report_raw_events(mem);
>> @@ -291,20 +298,9 @@ static int report_events(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
>>   	rep_argv[i++] = "--mem-mode";
>>   	rep_argv[i++] = "-n"; /* display number of samples */
>>   
>> -	/*
>> -	 * there is no weight (cost) associated with stores, so don't print
>> -	 * the column
>> -	 */
>> -	if (!(mem->operation & MEM_OPERATION_LOAD)) {
>> -		if (mem->phys_addr)
>> -			rep_argv[i++] = "--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
>> -					"dso_daddr,tlb,locked,phys_daddr";
>> -		else
>> -			rep_argv[i++] = "--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
>> -					"dso_daddr,tlb,locked";
>> -	} else if (mem->phys_addr)
>> -		rep_argv[i++] = "--sort=local_weight,mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
>> -				"dso_daddr,snoop,tlb,locked,phys_daddr";
>> +	new_sort_order = get_sort_order(mem);
>> +	if (new_sort_order)
>> +		rep_argv[i++] = new_sort_order;
>>   
>>   	for (j = 1; j < argc; j++, i++)
>>   		rep_argv[i] = argv[j];
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.h b/tools/perf/util/sort.h
>> index ea8ff64..fc8290c 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/sort.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.h
>> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ extern struct sort_entry sort_srcline;
>>   extern enum sort_type sort__first_dimension;
>>   extern const char default_mem_sort_order[];
>>   
>> +#define MAX_SORT_ORDER_STR	128
>> +
>>   struct he_stat {
>>   	u64			period;
>>   	u64			period_sys;
>> -- 
>> 2.7.4
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ