[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190128114041.ujyrq4ls6kbi7w3a@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:40:41 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR QXL VIRTUAL GPU"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR QXL VIRTUAL GPU"
<spice-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/23] drm/qxl: move qxl_primary_apply_cursor to
correct place
Hi,
> > If the above explains things better to you I should probably replace the
> > commit message with that.
>
> This is actually my first review of a driver that I'm not familiar with.
> I'm not quite sure how much in depth understanding that is required to
> put my ack on it.
Usually I try to show that by picking either Reviewed-by (I'm confident
the changes are fine) or Acked-by (Changes look sane, but I don't know
the code base and/or hardware good enough to be sure).
> Going further into the patchset I realised that
> there's no way that I can verify the logic without being intimate with
> the driver.
Yep. Same for me when looking at patches for other drivers. I think
this is one reason why it isn't that easy to get patches for drivers
reviewed where effectively only a single maintainer/developer is working
on.
> I liked your expanded explanation better.
Updated the commit message.
cheers,
Gerd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists