linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] pinctrl: sirf: drop pointless static qualifier in sirfsoc_gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdb0V5e5=OgaFe=jPubEV-JaDNpEGNjE24SjZAAuEtMweQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Jan 2019 14:43:41 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc:     Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] pinctrl: sirf: drop pointless static qualifier in sirfsoc_gpio_probe

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:42 AM YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> wrote:

> There is no need to have the 'sgpio' variable static since new
> value always be assigned before use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>

Patch applied.

I haven't heard from the SirfSoC people in some time, I wonder
if they still actively maintain this file?

Yours,
Linus Walleij