[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190128064701.r25ffs5ixzkcd5r6@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 12:17:01 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
edubezval@...il.com, swboyd@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
mka@...omium.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] cpufreq: Add flag to auto-register as cooling
device
On 28-01-19, 12:11, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Add a flag for cpufreq drivers to tell cpufreq core to auto-register
> themselves as a thermal cooling device.
>
> There series converts over all the drivers except arm_big_little.c.
> Tested on SDM845 with the qcom-cpufreq-hw driver. Only compile-tested the
> others.
>
> Things needing fixing (but not a blocker for the series):
> - Look at how to detect that we're not in IKS mode in arm_big_little's
> .ready callback.
>
> Chnages since v3:
> - Got rid of wrapper function to register/unregister cooling devices.
> Directly call the function in cpufreq.c
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists