[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8aa46db0-6983-62c4-7dc6-e006d20cd84b@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 09:58:05 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/events: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
On 1/29/19 9:25 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 12:49:17PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>>
>> In file included from arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:22:
>> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c: In function ‘intel_pmu_init’:
>> arch/x86/events/intel/../perf_event.h:668:17: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> x86_pmu.quirks = &__quirk; \
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:4170:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘x86_add_quirk’
>> x86_add_quirk(intel_clovertown_quirk);
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:4171:2: note: here
>> case INTEL_FAM6_CORE2_MEROM_L:
>> ^~~~
>> arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c:929:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 2 ++
>> arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> You do know how to use scripts/get_maintainer.pl, right?
>
> Because I don't see PeterZ on CC.
>
> Please use that script when preparing patches.
>
$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nokeywords --nogit --nogit-fallback arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> (reviewer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))
x86@...nel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))
$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nokeywords --nogit --nogit-fallback arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> (reviewer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))
x86@...nel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))
Does the MAINTAINERS file need an update?
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists