linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 29 (security/safesetid/)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ-EccMgDvx81g-XgWymdYn_G5Ou8mgbef3GUbx-C_Ai5qF-pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:21:16 -0800
From:   Micah Morton <mortonm@...omium.org>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 29 (security/safesetid/)

I noticed you don't have the following lines (or some of the other
related security ones) in your .config.

CONFIG_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_WRITABLE_HOOKS=y

Seems like we need a 'depends on SECURITY' line (or something like
that) in security/safesetid/Kconfig -- let me see if that fixes things
and if so I'll upload a patch

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:04 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On 1/28/19 10:11 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20190125:
> >
>
> on x86_64:
>
> ld: security/safesetid/lsm.o:(.data+0x10): undefined reference to `security_hook_heads'
> ld: security/safesetid/lsm.o:(.data+0x38): undefined reference to `security_hook_heads'
> ld: security/safesetid/lsm.o: in function `safesetid_security_init':
> lsm.c:(.init.text+0x14): undefined reference to `security_add_hooks'
>
>
> Full randconfig file is attached.
>
> --
> ~Randy