linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the qcom tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPBZ5QeLEHOLJDBW4zGXJ8DayvDU3V=rGJ6Ty-pKruZEYv88DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:30:08 -0600
From:   Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
To:     Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Dai <daidavid1@...eaurora.org>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the qcom tree

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 05:46, Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 1/29/19 05:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the char-misc tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> >
> > between commits:
> >
> >   05556681948b ("arm64: dts: sdm845: Add videocc node")
> >   5b6f186f0abb ("arm64: dts: sdm845: Add rpmh powercontroller node")
> >
> > from the qcom tree and commit:
> >
> >   ae0037dbfc5e ("arm64: dts: sdm845: Add interconnect provider DT nodes")
> >
> > from the char-misc tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.

Greg,
I'd prefer in this instance that this patch get dropped from
char-misc.  I have too much stuff in flight with some additional
patches coming in to mess with this right now.  And we don't have
clients rdy anyway for this so let's wait till next cycle on this one.

Andy