[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190129205827.GM10108@mellanox.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:58:35 +0000
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
CC: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device
vma
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 01:39:49PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> implement the mapping. And I don't think we should have 'special' vma's
> for this (though we may need something to ensure we don't get mapping
> requests mixed with different types of pages...).
I think Jerome explained the point here is to have a 'special vma'
rather than a 'special struct page' as, really, we don't need a
struct page at all to make this work.
If I recall your earlier attempts at adding struct page for BAR
memory, it ran aground on issues related to O_DIRECT/sgls, etc, etc.
This does seem to avoid that pitfall entirely as we can never
accidently get into the SGL system with this kind of memory or VMA?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists