linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH ghak105 V2] audit: remove audit_context when CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHC9VhRoTkXgiD8vRtHZFERL+pdDhobuAh9yb_0pFXe__pQmzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Jan 2019 18:26:21 -0500
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak105 V2] audit: remove audit_context when CONFIG_ AUDIT
 and not AUDITSYSCALL

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:18 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 2019-01-29 18:07, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:33 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > Remove audit_context from struct task_struct and struct audit_buffer
> > > when CONFIG_AUDIT is enabled but CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL is not.
> > >
> > > Also, audit_log_name() (and supporting inode and fcaps functions) should
> > > have been put back in auditsc.c when soft and hard link logging was
> > > normalized since it is only used by syscall auditing.
> > >
> > > See github issue https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/105
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changelog:
> > > v2:
> > > - resolve merge conflicts from rebase on upstreamed ghak103 patch
> > > - wrap task_struct audit_context in CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
> > >
> > >  include/linux/sched.h |   4 +-
> > >  kernel/audit.c        | 157 +++-----------------------------------------------
> > >  kernel/audit.h        |   9 ---
> > >  kernel/auditsc.c      | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  4 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-)
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> > > index 3f3f1888cac7..15e41603fd34 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/audit.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> > > @@ -205,7 +205,9 @@ struct audit_net {
> > >   * use simultaneously. */
> > >  struct audit_buffer {
> > >         struct sk_buff       *skb;      /* formatted skb ready to send */
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
> > >         struct audit_context *ctx;      /* NULL or associated context */
> > > +#endif
> > >         gfp_t                gfp_mask;
> > >  };
> > >
> > > @@ -1696,7 +1698,9 @@ static struct audit_buffer *audit_buffer_alloc(struct audit_context *ctx,
> > >         if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0))
> > >                 goto err;
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
> > >         ab->ctx = ctx;
> > > +#endif
> >
> > I vaguely remember reading/hearing something in the past about
> > kmem_cache_alloc() not returning a zero'd out buffer in all cases, can
> > you say for certain that "ab" in this case is always going to be
> > zero'd out?  This is an honest question.
>
> Ok, then maybe we should be using kmem_cache_zalloc() instead of
> kmem_cache_alloc() in audit_buffer_alloc()?  (as I've done in
> the last patch of ghak81/first patch of ghak90)
>
> If this is too much overhead, then we can initialize ctx = NULL;

We don't need zalloc() since we're setting all the fields, although
more on this below ...

> > If we can't guarantee that "ab" is zero'd out, we should manually set
> > ab->ctx to NULL when !CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL.
>
> But ctx isn't part of struct audit_buffer when !CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL.  It
> is #ifdef-ed out.  What am I missing?

You're not, I am.  I saw the obvious bit where you removed it from the
task_struct, but completely glossed over the bit where you also
removed it from the audit_buffer struct.  My mistake.

Once the audit container ID stuff lands we are going to need to have
the audit_context pointer in the audit_buffer regardless of the
CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL setting, right?  Assuming the answer is yes, I
think I'd just assume leave the pointer in the audit_buffer (setting
it to NULL when !CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL) so we don't have to have those
#ifdef's in the middle of the functions (I generally like to avoid
those if possible).  I think it's still worth making the changes to
task_struct, as that is the right thing to do and doesn't have the
same level of impact.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com