linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] input: goodix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190129091651.GA8497@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
Date:   Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:16:51 +0100
From:   Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>
To:     Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: goodix - support Goodix gt5688

Hi,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 07:24:33PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 18:03 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > From what I've seen in vendor trees it's fine to treat this as gt1x¹.
> > 
> > [1]: https://github.com/TadiT7/android_kernel_mtk-4.4/tree/master/drivers/input/touchscreen/mediatek/GT5688
> 
> Can you please point to the exact line of code that makes you say that?
> I'm not saying it's not compatible, but it's not the same driver that
> the current goodix.c was based on, or even goodix.c.
>
> Can you please elaborate?

I basically looked at the registers uses for the config update:

https://github.com/TadiT7/android_kernel_mtk-4.4/blob/master/drivers/input/touchscreen/mediatek/GT5688/include/gt1x_tpd_common.h#L152
https://github.com/TadiT7/android_kernel_mtk-4.4/blob/master/drivers/input/touchscreen/mediatek/GT5688/gt1x_generic.c#L430

That and the fact that the driver is doing it's job well made me believe
that's good for base support. Things like hotknot, gesture wakeup and
proximity sensor will need additional work.

> Finding that data in the specs would also be fine:
> https://github.com/hadess/gt9xx/tree/master/specifications

https://github.com/hadess/gt9xx/pull/3

Cheers,
 -- Guido