[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874l9rsson.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:45:44 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>, acme@...nel.org
Cc: jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, dzickus@...hat.com,
fowles@...each.com, jmario@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf mem/c2c: Fix perf_mem_events to support powerpc
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com> writes:
> On 1/14/19 9:44 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>> Powerpc hw does not have inbuilt latency filter (--ldlat) for mem-load
>> event and, perf_mem_events by default includes ldlat=30 which is
>> causing failure on powerpc. Refactor code to support perf mem/c2c on
>> powerpc.
>>
>> This patch depends on kernel side changes done my Madhavan:
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2018-December/182596.html
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
>
>
> Arnaldo / Michael, Any thoughts?
I haven't merged the kernel patch, I think because Maddy told me not to
because it would break the userspace tooling :)
What is the actual dependency between them? ie. should we merge the
kernel fix first or second or what?
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists