[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190129113213.036611619@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:36:05 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.20 114/117] mt76x0: do not perform MCU calibration for MT7630
4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
commit a83150eaad42769e4d08b6e07956a489e40214ae upstream.
Driver works better for MT7630 without MCU calibration, which
looks like it can hangs the firmware. Vendor driver do not
perform it for MT7630 as well.
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/mt76x0.h | 5 +++++
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/phy.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/mt76x0.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/mt76x0.h
@@ -41,6 +41,11 @@ static inline bool is_mt7610e(struct mt7
void mt76x0_init_debugfs(struct mt76x02_dev *dev);
+static inline bool is_mt7630(struct mt76x02_dev *dev)
+{
+ return mt76_chip(&dev->mt76) == 0x7630;
+}
+
/* Init */
struct mt76x02_dev *
mt76x0_alloc_device(struct device *pdev,
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/phy.c
@@ -588,6 +588,9 @@ void mt76x0_phy_calibrate(struct mt76x02
int is_5ghz = (chan->band == NL80211_BAND_5GHZ) ? 1 : 0;
u32 val, tx_alc, reg_val;
+ if (is_mt7630(dev))
+ return;
+
if (power_on) {
mt76x02_mcu_calibrate(dev, MCU_CAL_R, 0, false);
mt76x02_mcu_calibrate(dev, MCU_CAL_VCO, chan->hw_value,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists