[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612BA4B98D02@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:39:17 +0000
From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] refcount_t: add ACQUIRE ordering on success for
dec(sub)_and_test variants
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 03:29:10PM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote:
>
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
> > > index dbaed55..ab8f584 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
> > > @@ -67,16 +67,29 @@ static __always_inline void refcount_dec(refcount_t *r)
> > > static __always_inline __must_check
> > > bool refcount_sub_and_test(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
> > > {
> > > - return GEN_BINARY_SUFFIXED_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "subl",
> > > + bool ret = GEN_BINARY_SUFFIXED_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "subl",
> > >
> REFCOUNT_CHECK_LT_ZERO,
> > > r-
> >refs.counter, e, "er", i, "cx");
> > > +
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
> > > + return true;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return false;
> >
> > There appears to be some white-space damage (here and in other places);
> > checkpatch.pl should point these and other style problems out.
>
> It's worse...
>
> patch: **** malformed patch at line 81: diff --git
> a/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/refcount.h
>
> And yes, there's a lot of whitespace damage all around. Lots of trailing
> spaces too.
I am very sorry about this, smth is really wrong with my system, in addition to all
above, I haven't even received Andrea reply to my inbox, neither this patch itself.
I will fix all the whitespacing/trailing stuff and address this comment from Andrea:
"Mmh, this property (A-cumulativity) isn't really associated to ACQUIREs
in the LKMM; I'd suggest to simply remove the last sentence."
Anything else that needs fixing, content-wise?
Best Regards,
Elena.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists