[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190130180526.4DE9.4A936039@socionext.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:05:27 +0900
From: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: uniphier: Fix probe error handling
Hi Axel,
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:11:09 +0800 <axel.lin@...ics.com> wrote:
> Ensure unwind all resources if probe fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/uniphier-regulator.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/uniphier-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/uniphier-regulator.c
> index abf22acbd13e..6ba0ae405f2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/uniphier-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/uniphier-regulator.c
> @@ -87,8 +87,10 @@ static int uniphier_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, priv->data->regconf);
> - if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> - return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(regmap);
> + goto out_rst_assert;
> + }
Surely this return without asserting resets is wrong. This looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
Thank you,
---
Best Regards,
Kunihiko Hayashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists