[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17220216-4b18-be33-78e2-5cfc517aed27@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:43:54 +0800
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
CC: <bbrezillon@...nel.org>, <richard@....at>, <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
<computersforpeace@...il.com>, <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
<christophe.kerello@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: Make some functions
static
On 2019/1/30 18:34, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Yue,
>
> YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> wrote on Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:09:08
> +0800:
>
>> Fixes the following sparse warning:
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c:1228:6: warning: symbol 'stm32_fmc2_read_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c:1275:6: warning: symbol 'stm32_fmc2_write_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c:1707:32: warning: symbol 'stm32_fmc2_nand_ooblayout_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c
>> index e057282..999ca6a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c
>> @@ -1225,8 +1225,8 @@ static irqreturn_t stm32_fmc2_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> }
>>
>> -void stm32_fmc2_read_data(struct nand_chip *chip, void *buf,
>> - unsigned int len, bool force_8bit)
>> +static void stm32_fmc2_read_data(struct nand_chip *chip, void *buf,
>> + unsigned int len, bool force_8bit)
>> {
>> struct stm32_fmc2_nfc *fmc2 = to_stm32_nfc(chip->controller);
>> void __iomem *io_addr_r = fmc2->data_base[fmc2->cs_sel];
>> @@ -1272,8 +1272,8 @@ void stm32_fmc2_read_data(struct nand_chip *chip, void *buf,
>> stm32_fmc2_set_buswidth_16(fmc2, true);
>> }
>>
>> -void stm32_fmc2_write_data(struct nand_chip *chip, const void *buf,
>> - unsigned int len, bool force_8bit)
>> +static void stm32_fmc2_write_data(struct nand_chip *chip, const void *buf,
>> + unsigned int len, bool force_8bit)
>> {
>> struct stm32_fmc2_nfc *fmc2 = to_stm32_nfc(chip->controller);
>> void __iomem *io_addr_w = fmc2->data_base[fmc2->cs_sel];
>> @@ -1704,7 +1704,7 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_nand_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops stm32_fmc2_nand_ooblayout_ops = {
>> +static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops stm32_fmc2_nand_ooblayout_ops = {
>> .ecc = stm32_fmc2_nand_ooblayout_ecc,
>> .free = stm32_fmc2_nand_ooblayout_free,
>> };
>
> This is nand/next material, so if you don't mind I would like to squash
> this fix into the original commit inserting the driver.
Sure, ok
>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists