lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:38:40 +0800
From:   Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>
Cc:     Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael.Kao@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: mtk: Allocate enough space for mtk_thermal.

On δΈ‰, 2019-01-30 at 11:04 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 30/01/2019 10:25, Pi-Hsun Shih wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:44 PM Daniel Lezcano
> > <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 30/01/2019 07:04, Peter Shih wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Adding Michael Kao to cc list.
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:57 PM Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.or
> > > > g> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > The mtk_thermal struct contains a 'struct mtk_thermal_bank
> > > > > banks[];',
> > > > > but the allocation only allocates sizeof(struct mtk_thermal)
> > > > > bytes,
> > > > > which cause out of bound access with the ->banks[] member.
> > > > > Change it to
> > > > > a fixed size array instead.
> > > Even if the fix is correct, it pushes back the bug later in time
> > > if a
> > > new board containing more than MAX_NUM_ZONES is introduced. I
> > > suggest to
> > > dynamically allocate the array with the 'num_banks' value.
> > > 
> > For the current code structure, those mtk_thermal_data are
> > statically declared,
> > so if there's new board containing more than MAX_NUM_ZONES of
> > bank_data, it
> > would actually be a compile error.
> > 
> > I'm fine with either way, but feel like that this is simpler than
> > manually
> > calculating the size needed for allocation.
> Right, I missed it can be caught at compile time.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> 
As this is a bugfix, I will take it and queue it for next -rc.

thanks,
rui
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ