[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12103603.N4N57GesWC@tauon.chronox.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:39:10 +0100
From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@...il.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Ryan Chen <yu.chen.surf@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] General Key Derivation Function Support
Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2019, 11:08:54 CET schrieb Herbert Xu:
Hi Herbert,
> I'm still not convinced why this needs to go into the crypto API
> instead of being hosted in a helper which should achieve pretty
> much the same result.
How do you propose to handle the FIPS 140-2 related requirements of enforcing
the integrity test result and the known-answer self tests?
Thanks
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists