linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Save switch rules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190130145447.GB21904@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:54:47 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
        Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Save switch rules

> So your proposal is to refuse suspending when using a mv88e6xxx switch.

Hi Miquèl

That is the first step. It makes the mv88e6xxx suspend compliant, in
that it currently does not support suspend.

> What about the current situation where suspending is allowed, but all
> the configuration gone?

That is broken. The whole point of suspending is that you resume back
to the original state.

   Andrew