[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190130164007.26497-3-joro@8bytes.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:40:04 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jfehlig@...e.com,
jon.grimm@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, joro@...tes.org,
jroedel@...e.de, Thomas.Lendacky@....com
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] swiotlb: Add is_swiotlb_active() function
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
This function will be used from dma_direct code to determine
the maximum segment size of a dma mapping.
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
---
include/linux/swiotlb.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
index 1c22d96e1742..e9e786b4b598 100644
--- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
+++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ extern void swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(struct device *hwdev,
extern int
swiotlb_dma_supported(struct device *hwdev, u64 mask);
size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev);
+bool is_swiotlb_active(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
extern enum swiotlb_force swiotlb_force;
@@ -100,6 +101,11 @@ static inline size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev)
{
return SIZE_MAX;
}
+
+static inline bool is_swiotlb_active(void)
+{
+ return false;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_SWIOTLB */
extern void swiotlb_print_info(void);
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 9cb21259cb0b..c873f9cc2146 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -667,3 +667,12 @@ size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev)
{
return ((size_t)1 << IO_TLB_SHIFT) * IO_TLB_SEGSIZE;
}
+
+bool is_swiotlb_active(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * When SWIOTLB is initialized, even if io_tlb_start points to physical
+ * address zero, io_tlb_end surely doesn't.
+ */
+ return io_tlb_end != 0;
+}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists