lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA23075014642D8B6@US01WEMBX2.internal.synopsys.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:47:52 +0000
From:   Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:     Eugeniy Paltsev <eugeniy.paltsev@...opsys.com>,
        "Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com" <eugeniy.paltsev@...opsys.com>,
        "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Alexey Brodkin" <alexey.brodkin@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARCv2: introduce unaligned access under a Kconfig
 option

On 1/30/19 8:44 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>> I'd prefer to change the define of STATUS_AD_MASK itself and keep all of this
>> unchanged !
>>
> Actually I'd prefer to leave STATUS_AD_MASK untouched. Otherwise we will implicitly assign
> wrong value to STATUS_AD_MASK which is quite misleading.
>
> BTW, STATUS_AD_MASK is used in ASM code in v2 patch and it shouldn't be dependent on
> CONFIG_ARC_USE_UNALIGNED_MEM_ACCESS.

Agree !

-Vineet

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ