[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA23075014642D8B6@US01WEMBX2.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:47:52 +0000
From: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Eugeniy Paltsev <eugeniy.paltsev@...opsys.com>,
"Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com" <eugeniy.paltsev@...opsys.com>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Alexey Brodkin" <alexey.brodkin@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARCv2: introduce unaligned access under a Kconfig
option
On 1/30/19 8:44 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>> I'd prefer to change the define of STATUS_AD_MASK itself and keep all of this
>> unchanged !
>>
> Actually I'd prefer to leave STATUS_AD_MASK untouched. Otherwise we will implicitly assign
> wrong value to STATUS_AD_MASK which is quite misleading.
>
> BTW, STATUS_AD_MASK is used in ASM code in v2 patch and it shouldn't be dependent on
> CONFIG_ARC_USE_UNALIGNED_MEM_ACCESS.
Agree !
-Vineet
Powered by blists - more mailing lists