[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a6ce2e6-620e-ca73-d21d-207c8f9248ce@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:10:05 +0000
From: "Kuehling, Felix" <Felix.Kuehling@....com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
"Zhou, David(ChunMing)" <David1.Zhou@....com>
CC: Mark Nutter <Mark.Nutter@....com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Fix if preprocessor statement above
kfd_fill_iolink_info_for_cpu
Thank you, Nathan. I applied your patch to amd-staging-drm-next.
Sorry for the late response. I'm catching up with my email backlog after
a vacation.
Regards,
Felix
On 2019-01-21 6:52 p.m., Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Clang warns:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdkfd/kfd_crat.c:866:5: warning:
> 'CONFIG_X86_64' is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef]
> #if CONFIG_X86_64
> ^
> 1 warning generated.
>
> Fixes: d1c234e2cd10 ("drm/amdkfd: Allow building KFD on ARM64 (v2)")
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Resending as I forgot to add the lists...
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.c
> index 5d85ff341385..2e7c44955f43 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.c
> @@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ static int kfd_fill_mem_info_for_cpu(int numa_node_id, int *avail_size,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#if CONFIG_X86_64
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> static int kfd_fill_iolink_info_for_cpu(int numa_node_id, int *avail_size,
> uint32_t *num_entries,
> struct crat_subtype_iolink *sub_type_hdr)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists