[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1cf3a2a-c8ad-fd33-47fb-9a9d8230c24f@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:12:18 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Mimi,
On 1/31/19 1:58 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> [Cc'ing James Morris]
>
> On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 21:47 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
>>>>
>>
>> BTW, thanks, Casey. I'll take this in my tree.
>
> This patch touches multiple LSMs and IMA. As James has already picked
> up similar patches, which are in his next-general branch, perhaps he
> could also pick up an updated version of this one.
>
Yeah. I can either integrate your recent fix and respin if you don't mind,
or remove the fall-through comment and wait for James to take both patches,
yours and mine.
What do you prefer?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists