linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:12:18 -0600
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs

Mimi,

On 1/31/19 1:58 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> [Cc'ing James Morris]
> 
> On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 21:47 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> 
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
>>>>
>>
>> BTW, thanks, Casey.  I'll take this in my tree.
> 
> This patch touches multiple LSMs and IMA.  As James has already picked
> up similar patches, which are in his next-general branch, perhaps he
> could also pick up an updated version of this one.
> 

Yeah.  I can either integrate your recent fix and respin if you don't mind,
or remove the fall-through comment and wait for James to take both patches,
yours and mine.

What do you prefer?

Thanks
--
Gustavo