linux-kernel - Re: Fwd: [PATCH v14 0/3] PPS: pps-gpio PPS ECHO implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <df314ee9176095b5d59af8659c95a274fb0613c4.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 19:23:44 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     tom burkart <tom@...sec.com>,
        Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
Cc:     Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH v14 0/3] PPS: pps-gpio PPS ECHO implementation

On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 12:40 +1100, tom burkart wrote:
> Quoting Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>:
> --------
> Subject	Re: [PATCH v14 2/3] dt-bindings: pps: pps-gpio PPS ECHO implementation
> 
> I think this patch it's OK but I'm asking to myself if it should be  
> merged with
> next one... logically it describes what patch 3/3 does so why do we keep them
> separated?
> -------
> I have separated it because scripts/checkpatch.pl insists it needs to  
> be separated.

checkpatch doesn't insist on anything.  It's a stupid script.

Always prefer your best judgment over a stupid script.