lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8B2B011D-6E2E-4FEA-8FEE-B69D437B8547@icloud.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 19:32:37 -0800
From:   Theodore Dubois <tblodt@...oud.com>
To:     Theodore Dubois <tblodt@...oud.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: edge case in posix file lock deadlock detection

I'm having trouble figuring out how the kernel handles a particular case in deadlock detection on posix file locks. Here's the scenario:

PID 1: locks byte 2
PID 3: locks byte 0
PID 2: locks byte 10
PID 1: locks byte 10
PID 2: locks bytes 0-2 inclusive

The last step fails with EDEADLK, but I'm not sure how that is detected. The specified range conflicts with two different locks, and the first loop in posix_lock_inode would find whichever one comes first in the linked list, and pass that to the deadlock detector.

If the lock on byte 2 comes first in the list, a cycle would be found between the lock on byte 2 and the lock on byte 10. But if the lock on byte 0 comes first, the deadlock detector would return NULL from what_owner_is_waiting_for on that lock since PID 3 has no other locks, and immediately succeed.

What am I missing?

Thanks,
~Theodore

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ