[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190131064139.GB28876@rapoport-lnx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:41:39 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
uclinux-h8-devel@...ts.sourceforge.jp,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@....edu.cn>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
openrisc@...ts.librecores.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 19/21] treewide: add checks for the return value of
memblock_alloc*()
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 07:07:46AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 21/01/2019 à 09:04, Mike Rapoport a écrit :
> >Add check for the return value of memblock_alloc*() functions and call
> >panic() in case of error.
> >The panic message repeats the one used by panicing memblock allocators with
> >adjustment of parameters to include only relevant ones.
> >
> >The replacement was mostly automated with semantic patches like the one
> >below with manual massaging of format strings.
> >
> >@@
> >expression ptr, size, align;
> >@@
> >ptr = memblock_alloc(size, align);
> >+ if (!ptr)
> >+ panic("%s: Failed to allocate %lu bytes align=0x%lx\n", __func__,
> >size, align);
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> >Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com> # c-sky
> >Acked-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com> # MIPS
> >Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> # s390
> >Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com> # Xen
> >---
>
> [...]
>
> >diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> >index 7ea5dc6..ad94242 100644
> >--- a/mm/sparse.c
> >+++ b/mm/sparse.c
>
> [...]
>
> >@@ -425,6 +436,10 @@ static void __init sparse_buffer_init(unsigned long size, int nid)
> > memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(size, PAGE_SIZE,
> > __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS),
> > MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
> >+ if (!sparsemap_buf)
> >+ panic("%s: Failed to allocate %lu bytes align=0x%lx nid=%d from=%lx\n",
> >+ __func__, size, PAGE_SIZE, nid, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS));
> >+
>
> memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() does not panic (help explicitly says: Does not
> zero allocated memory, does not panic if request cannot be satisfied.).
"Does not panic" does not mean it always succeeds.
> Stephen Rothwell reports a boot failure due to this change.
Please see my reply on that thread.
> Christophe
>
> > sparsemap_buf_end = sparsemap_buf + size;
> > }
> >
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists