linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] mfd: Add support for the MediaTek MT6358 PMIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1548923635.25380.4.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:33:55 +0800
From:   Hsin-hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>
To:     Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>
CC:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mfd: Add support for the MediaTek MT6358 PMIC

Hi Pi-Hsun,

On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 11:56 +0800, Pi-Hsun Shih wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:19 PM Hsin-Hsiung Wang
> <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > This adds support for the MediaTek MT6358 PMIC. This is a
> > multifunction device with the following sub modules:
> >
> > - Regulator
> > - RTC
> > - Codec
> > - Interrupt
...
> > +static const struct mfd_cell mt6358_devs[] = {
> > +       {
> > +               .name = "mt6358-regulator",
> > +               .of_compatible = "mediatek,mt6358-regulator"
> > +       }, {
> > +               .name = "mt6397-rtc",
> 
> Should this be "mt6358-rtc"?

Because MT6358 rtc uses the same rtc driver as MT6397, the name should
be "mt6397-rtc" for rtc driver probe.

Thanks a lot.
> > +               .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(mt6358_rtc_resources),
> > +               .resources = mt6358_rtc_resources,
> > +               .of_compatible = "mediatek,mt6358-rtc",
> > +       }, {
> > +               .name = "mt6358-sound",
> > +               .of_compatible = "mediatek,mt6358-sound"
> > +       },
> > +};
...
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >