linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] mfd / platform: cros_ec: move cros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFqH_51Mk7_bK8vw8yuUPpvEouAwQjXEGW9JFqH1S4U9Ndr3+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:28:40 +0100
From:   Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] mfd / platform: cros_ec: move cros_ec sysfs
 attributes to its own drivers.

Hi Lee,

Missatge de Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> del dia dc., 16 de gen.
2019 a les 19:31:
>
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is another patchset to try to cleanup a bit more the crossed
> > references for cros-ec driver between the MFD and the platform/chrome
> > subsystems.
> >
> > The purpose of these patches is get rid of the different cros-ec attributes
> > from mfd/cros_ec_dev to its own sub-driver in platform/chrome. cros_ec_dev
> > continues instantiating the sub-devices but the sysfs attributes are owned
> > by the platform driver.E.g. The lightbar driver should own his sysfs
> > attributes and be instantiated only if the Embedded Controller has a
> > lightbar.
> >
> > The patchset also adds the documentation of the sysfs attributes.
> >
> > Most of the patches touches mfd subsystem and platform/chrome so I'd
> > suggest go all using and inmutable branch.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >  Enric
>
> [...]
>
> > Enric Balletbo i Serra (7):
> >   mfd / platform: cros_ec: use devm_mfd_add_devices
> >   mfd / platform: cros_ec: move lightbar attributes to its own driver
> >   mfd / platform: cros_ec: move vbc attributes to its own driver
> >   mfd / platform: cros_ec: move debugfs attributes to its own driver
> >   mfd / platform: cros_ec: move device sysfs attributes to its own
> >     driver
> >   mfd / platform: cros_ec_vbc: instantiate only if the EC has a VBC
> >     NVRAM
> >   platform/chrome: cros_ec_lightbar: instantiate only if the EC has a
> >     lightbar
>
> These patches have been applied to my local MFD tree.  It will be
> pushed when 5.0-rc3 has been released.  The MFD tree needs rebasing
> onto it since it contains all of the MFD patches due for v5.0.
>

Do you mind to push the patches in your tree, I've some patches that
depend on these to apply cleanly and I'd like to base my branch on top
of yours.

Thanks,
  Enric

> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]
> Linaro Services Technical Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog