linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] kcov: convert kcov.refcount to refcount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:09:32 +0000
From:   "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
CC:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] kcov: convert kcov.refcount to refcount_t

> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:04 AM Reshetova, Elena
> <elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> >  > Just to check, has this been tested with CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL and
> > > > something poking kcov?
> > > >
> > > > Given lib/refcount.c is instrumented, the refcount_*() calls will
> > > > recurse back into the kcov code. It looks like that's fine, given these
> > > > are only manipulated in setup/teardown paths, but it would be nice to be
> > > > sure.
> > >
> > > A simple program using KCOV is available here:
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.0-rc3/source/Documentation/dev-
> > > tools/kcov.rst#L42
> > > or here (it's like strace but collects and prints KCOV coverage):
> > > https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/tools/kcovtrace/kcovtrace.c
> > >
> >
> > Ok, so I finally got to compile kcov in and try the first test program
> > and it works fine as far as I can see: runs, prints results, and no WARNs anywhere
> > visible with regards to refcount_t.
> >
> > I did my test on 4.20 with CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL=y
> > since I have serious issues getting 5.0 running as it is even from
> > the stable branch, but unless kcov underwent some serious changes since
> December,
> > it should not affect.
> 
> There were no changes that should affect this part.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>


Thank you! Will you be able to take this change forward as for 
other normal kcov changes? 

Best Regards,
Elena.