linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] mfd: tqmx86: IO controller with i2c, wachdog and gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190131102315.GK4701@dell>
Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:23:15 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Emeric Dupont <emeric.dupont@....aero>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mfd: tqmx86: IO controller with i2c, wachdog and gpio

On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Andrew Lunn wrote:

> > > Hi Lee
> > > 
> > > I posted a new version.
> > > 
> > > Your email indicates you are using Mutt:
> > > 
> > > >User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
> > > 
> > > Which is also what i use. I've never had issues with signatures like
> > > this. I also cannot find any documentation as to how you configure
> > > mutt remove signatures. How are you doing it?
> > 
> > I think it's automatic.  I certainly didn't set that up.
> 
> Interesting. My mutt installation does not do this. I trim emails
> manually to be netiquette compliant.
> 
> > Try replying to your own mail.  I should automatically cut.
> 
> Replying to my patch works fine. It does not cut the patch.
> 
> This is a bug somewhere, since the marker i used is not a signature
> marker. It did not have the space on the end.

Yes, you're correct, it should be "-- \n".  Give me a sec ...

Ah, it's an Emacs Post-Mode thing:

 ;;; Revision 1.6.0 1999/03/04 18:04 Rob Reid
 ;;; Returned post-signature-pattern to using "--" instead of "-- "
 ;;; because some senders have broken MTAs (as Eric reminded me) and
 ;;; some users don't use procmail to compensate.  This time all of the
 ;;; functions dealing with signatures have been smartened up to avoid
 ;;; false matches.  Unfortunately that means they don't use
 ;;; post-signature-pattern in its raw form.

> Anyway, getting the patch reviewed is more important to me than
> tracing down the bug...

Agreed.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog