[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <907779d2-09a8-47fb-4d77-c907cd716b3c@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:06:36 -0800
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
"Wang, Kemi" <kemi.wang@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: "yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com" <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"mhocko@...nel.org" <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"lkp@...org" <lkp@...org>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [mm] 9bc8039e71: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -64.1%
regression
On 12/27/18 6:55 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 12/27/2018 08:31 PM, Wang, Kemi wrote:
>> Hi, Waiman
>> Did you post that patch? Let's see if it helps.
>
> I did post the patch a while ago. I will need to rebase it to a new
> baseline. Will do that in a week or 2.
>
> -Longman
>
Waiman,
In a large scale OLTP benchmark, we are also seeing a 1% loss in performance
from patch 9bc8039e71. We'll be interested to try out your patch to
restore some optimistic spinning on reader held sem.
Thanks.
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists