[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94b9b0c9-1a24-63ba-5abe-5f6d79fed415@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:55:17 +0000
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
iommu <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/1] iommu: set the default iommu-dma mode as
non-strict
Hi,
On 31/01/2019 13:52, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Currently, many peripherals are faster than before. For example, the top
> speed of the older netcard is 10Gb/s, and now it's more than 25Gb/s. But
> when iommu page-table mapping enabled, it's hard to reach the top speed
> in strict mode, because of frequently map and unmap operations. In order
> to keep abreast of the times, I think it's better to set non-strict as
> default.
Most users won't be aware of this relaxation and will have their system
vulnerable to e.g. thunderbolt hotplug. See for example 4.3 Deferred
Invalidation in
http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/users/wwwb/cgi-bin/tr-get.cgi/2018/MSC/MSC-2018-21.pdf
Why not keep the policy to secure by default, as we do for
iommu.passthrough? And maybe add something similar to
CONFIG_IOMMU_DEFAULT_PASSTRHOUGH? It's easy enough for experts to pass a
command-line argument or change the default config.
Thanks,
Jean
>
> Below it's our iperf performance data of 25Gb netcard:
> strict mode: 18-20 Gb/s
> non-strict mode: 23.5 Gb/s
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 4 ++--
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index b799bcf..667221f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -1779,13 +1779,13 @@
>
> iommu.strict= [ARM64] Configure TLB invalidation behaviour
> Format: { "0" | "1" }
> - 0 - Lazy mode.
> + 0 - Lazy mode (default).
> Request that DMA unmap operations use deferred
> invalidation of hardware TLBs, for increased
> throughput at the cost of reduced device isolation.
> Will fall back to strict mode if not supported by
> the relevant IOMMU driver.
> - 1 - Strict mode (default).
> + 1 - Strict mode.
> DMA unmap operations invalidate IOMMU hardware TLBs
> synchronously.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 3ed4db3..10e0b49 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
> #else
> static unsigned int iommu_def_domain_type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA;
> #endif
> -static bool iommu_dma_strict __read_mostly = true;
> +static bool iommu_dma_strict __read_mostly;
>
> struct iommu_callback_data {
> const struct iommu_ops *ops;
> --
> 1.8.3
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists