[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190131153306.GT3691@localhost>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:33:06 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"open list:NFC SUBSYSTEM" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
chris@...-brannons.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, santhameena13@...il.com,
kirk@...sers.ca, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org,
m.maya.nakamura@...il.com, zhongjiang@...wei.com,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
speakup@...ux-speakup.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bluez mailing list <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
nishka.dasgupta_ug18@...oka.edu.in,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: Fix WARNING in tty_set_termios
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 04:18:33PM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > I agree with Al that this change doesn't make much sense. The WARN_ON
> > is there to catch any bugs leading to the termios being changed for a
> > master side pty. Those should bugs should be fixed, and not worked
> > around in order to silence a WARN_ON.
> >
> > The problem started with 7721383f4199 ("Bluetooth: hci_uart: Support
> > operational speed during setup") which introduced a new way for how
> > tty_set_termios() could end up being called for a master pty.
> >
> > As Al hinted at, setting these ldiscs for a master pty really makes no
> > sense and perhaps that is what we should prevent unless simply making
> > sure they do not call tty_set_termios() is sufficient for the time
> > being.
> >
> > Finally, note that serdev never operates on a pty, and that this is only
> > an issue for (the three) line disciplines.
>
> I think for PTYs we should just fail setting the HCI line discipline.
> Fail early and just move on with life.
Sounds good to me. At least for the pty master. There may be some people
trying to use a bluetooth device connected to a remote serial port (I've
seen descriptions of such setups at least), and maybe we need not prevent
that.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists