linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] misc: fastrpc: Add support for context Invoke method

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190131153419.GA18667@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:34:19 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, mark.rutland@....com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, bkumar@....qualcomm.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, thierry.escande@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] misc: fastrpc: Add support for context Invoke
 method

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 03:24:10PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> This patch adds support to compute context invoke method
> on the remote processor (DSP).
> This involves setting up the functions input and output arguments,
> input and output handles and mapping the dmabuf fd for the
> argument/handle buffers.
> 

This says _what_ this code does, but not why.  What about all of that
explaination you had in the 0/5 patch, shouldn't that be here, or on
patch 2/5?

Some nits below:

> +static int fastrpc_invoke(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp)
> +{
> +	struct fastrpc_invoke_args *args = NULL;
> +	struct fastrpc_invoke inv;
> +	u32 nscalars;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&inv, argp, sizeof(inv)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	nscalars = REMOTE_SCALARS_LENGTH(inv.sc);
> +	if (nscalars) {
> +		args = kcalloc(nscalars, sizeof(*args), GFP_KERNEL);

Yeah, let's not bounds check the input variables and suck up all of the
kernel memory!

Remember:
	ALL INPUT IS EVIL

> +		if (!args)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +		if (copy_from_user(args, (void __user *)(uintptr_t)inv.args,
> +				   nscalars * sizeof(*args))) {

That could be very big, again, check the input.

> +			kfree(args);
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	err = fastrpc_internal_invoke(fl, false, inv.handle, inv.sc, args);

What's the odds you check the input values here...  :(

> +static long fastrpc_device_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> +				 unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +	struct fastrpc_user *fl = (struct fastrpc_user *)file->private_data;
> +	char __user *argp = (char __user *)arg;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	switch (cmd) {
> +	case FASTRPC_IOCTL_INVOKE:
> +		err = fastrpc_invoke(fl, argp);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		err = -ENOTTY;
> +		dev_err(fl->sctx->dev, "bad ioctl: %d\n", cmd);

Don't spam the syslog if someone sends you an invalid ioctl.  That's a
sure way to DoS the system.

> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (err)
> +		dev_dbg(fl->sctx->dev, "Error: IOCTL Failed with %d\n", err);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct file_operations fastrpc_fops = {
>  	.open = fastrpc_device_open,
>  	.release = fastrpc_device_release,
> +	.unlocked_ioctl = fastrpc_device_ioctl,
> +	.compat_ioctl = fastrpc_device_ioctl,
>  };
>  
>  static int fastrpc_cb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -260,9 +932,25 @@ static int fastrpc_rpmsg_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
>  	return of_platform_populate(rdev->of_node, NULL, NULL, rdev);
>  }
>  
> +static void fastrpc_notify_users(struct fastrpc_user *user)
> +{
> +	struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, *n;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&user->lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(ctx, n, &user->pending, node)
> +		complete(&ctx->work);

Why safe?  You aren't deleting the list here.

> +	spin_unlock(&user->lock);
> +}
> +
>  static void fastrpc_rpmsg_remove(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
>  {
>  	struct fastrpc_channel_ctx *cctx = dev_get_drvdata(&rpdev->dev);
> +	struct fastrpc_user *user, *n;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&cctx->lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(user, n, &cctx->users, user)
> +		fastrpc_notify_users(user);

Same here.

> +	spin_unlock(&cctx->lock);
>  
>  	misc_deregister(&cctx->miscdev);
>  	of_platform_depopulate(&rpdev->dev);
> @@ -272,6 +960,31 @@ static void fastrpc_rpmsg_remove(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
>  static int fastrpc_rpmsg_callback(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data,
>  				  int len, void *priv, u32 addr)
>  {
> +	struct fastrpc_channel_ctx *cctx = dev_get_drvdata(&rpdev->dev);
> +	struct fastrpc_invoke_rsp *rsp = data;
> +	struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	unsigned long ctxid;
> +
> +	if (len < sizeof(*rsp)) {
> +		dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "invalid response or context\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

Again, don't allow userspace to spam the syslog.

> +
> +	ctxid = ((rsp->ctx & FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK) >> 4);
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&cctx->lock, flags);
> +	ctx = idr_find(&cctx->ctx_idr, ctxid);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cctx->lock, flags);
> +
> +	if (!ctx) {
> +		dev_err(&rpdev->dev, "No context ID matches response\n");
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +	}
> +
> +	ctx->retval = rsp->retval;
> +	complete(&ctx->work);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h b/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a69ef33dc37e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +
> +#ifndef __QCOM_FASTRPC_H__
> +#define __QCOM_FASTRPC_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#define FASTRPC_IOCTL_INVOKE		_IOWR('R', 3, struct fastrpc_invoke)
> +
> +struct fastrpc_invoke_args {
> +	__u64 ptr;
> +	__u64 length;
> +	__s32 fd;
> +	__u32 reserved;

Are you checking that reserved is all 0 now?

> +};
> +
> +struct fastrpc_invoke {
> +	__u32 handle;
> +	__u32 sc;
> +	__u64 args;
> +};

Do you need packed here?  What about endian issues?

thanks,

greg k-h