linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: don't return bool from update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190131160713.GD5629@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 18:07:13 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: don't return bool from update_timeouts

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 03:06:58PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > Set tpm_chip->timeouts_adjusted directly in the update_timeouts
> > code instead of returning bool. In case of tpm read failing
> > print warning that the read failed and continue on.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
> 
> Your signed-off-by should be before my reviewed-by (no need to
> resend).

... and linux-security-module is missing (need to resend).

/Jarkko