lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 18:07:13 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: don't return bool from update_timeouts

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 03:06:58PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > Set tpm_chip->timeouts_adjusted directly in the update_timeouts
> > code instead of returning bool. In case of tpm read failing
> > print warning that the read failed and continue on.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
> 
> Your signed-off-by should be before my reviewed-by (no need to
> resend).

... and linux-security-module is missing (need to resend).

/Jarkko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ