linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm/arm64: entry: Remove need

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 18:23:36 +0000
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm/arm64: entry: Remove need_resched() loop

A while back (before [1]), i386 had this in the tail of its irq
handling code:

  need_resched:
	  movl TI_flags(%ebp), %ecx       # need_resched set ?
	  testb $_TIF_NEED_RESCHED, %cl
	  jz restore_all
	  testl $IF_MASK,EFLAGS(%esp)     # interrupts off (exception path) ?
	  jz restore_all
	  sti
	  call preempt_schedule
	  cli
	  movl $0,TI_preempt_count(%ebp)
	  jmp need_resched

preempt_schedule() already had an inner need_resched() loop introduced by

  commit 4d0b85ea4610 ("[PATCH] kernel preemption bits (2/2)")

and the outer loop was needed since, as the above commit explains, it
was possible to return from preempt_schedule(), get an interrupt and
have need_resched() true.

This was eventually changed when preempt_schedule_irq() was introduced
by [1]:

  commit b268264c6299 ("[PATCH] sched: fix preemption race (Core/i386)")

which moved the enabling & disabling of interrupts inside the then
new preempt_schedule_irq(). From then on, the arch-code loop was no
longer necessary, providing preempt_schedule_irq() was used. This was
talked over on LKML in [2].

It's worth noting that it seems most archs calling
preempt_schedule_irq() have that outer loop, and for most of them it
really looks like they could get rid of it as well.

FWIW the suspects are

$ grep -r -I "preempt_schedule_irq" arch/ | cut -d/ -f2 | sort | uniq

  arc
  arm
  arm64
  c6x
  csky
  h8300
  ia64
  m68k
  microblaze
  mips
  nds32
  nios2
  parisc
  powerpc
  s390
  sh
  sparc
  x86
  xtensa


- Patches 1-2 remove the loop for arm & arm64
- Patch 3 adds a bit of documentation to point out the loop isn't needed
  to try and spread the word.

[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cc989920-a13b-d53b-db83-1584a7f53edc@arm.com/

Valentin Schneider (3):
  arm64: entry: Remove unneeded need_resched() loop
  ARM: entry: Remove unneeded need_resched() loop
  sched/Documentation: Point out use of preempt_schedule_irq()

 Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.txt | 10 ++++++++++
 arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S           | 12 +-----------
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S              | 11 +----------
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

--
2.20.1