linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1902021028320.24863@namei.org>
Date:   Sat, 2 Feb 2019 10:28:39 +1100 (AEDT)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
cc:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs

On Thu, 31 Jan 2019, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:

> 
> 
> On 1/31/19 2:20 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> 
> >>>
> >>> This patch touches multiple LSMs and IMA.  As James has already picked
> >>> up similar patches, which are in his next-general branch, perhaps he
> >>> could also pick up an updated version of this one.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yeah.  I can either integrate your recent fix and respin if you don't mind,
> >> or remove the fall-through comment and wait for James to take both patches,
> >> yours and mine.
> >>
> >> What do you prefer?
> > 
> > Either way is fine.
> > 
> 
> OK.  Well, I think in this case less is more, so I will integrate our changes
> into a single patch.

WFM

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>