lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190201005838.GA8082@eros.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:58:38 +1100
From:   "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
To:     "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: Increase width of first /proc/slabinfo column

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 11:42:42AM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
[snip]

This applies on top of Linus' tree

	commit e74c98ca2d6a ('gfs2: Revert "Fix loop in gfs2_rbm_find"')

For this patch I doubt very much that it matters but for the record I
can't find mention in MAINTAINERS which tree to base work on for slab
patches.  Are mm patches usually based of an mm tree or do you guys work
off linux-next?

thanks,
Tobin.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ