lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4428766.iRGOQCpFvn@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Fri, 01 Feb 2019 01:52:45 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/9] driver core: Do not call rpm_put_suppliers() in pm_runtime_drop_link()

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Calling rpm_put_suppliers() from pm_runtime_drop_link() is excessive
as it affects all suppliers of the consumer device and not just the
one pointed to by the device link being dropped.  Worst case it may
cause the consumer device to stop working unexpectedly.  Moreover, in
principle it is racy with respect to runtime PM of the consumer
device.

To avoid these problems drop runtime PM references on the particular
supplier pointed to by the link in question only and do that after
the link has been dropped from the consumer device's list of links to
suppliers, which is in device_link_free().

Fixes: a0504aecba76 ("PM / runtime: Drop usage count for suppliers at device link removal")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/base/core.c          |    3 +++
 drivers/base/power/runtime.c |    2 --
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/core.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -374,6 +374,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_link_add);
 
 static void device_link_free(struct device_link *link)
 {
+	while (refcount_dec_not_one(&link->rpm_active))
+		pm_runtime_put(link->supplier);
+
 	put_device(link->consumer);
 	put_device(link->supplier);
 	kfree(link);
Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -1611,8 +1611,6 @@ void pm_runtime_new_link(struct device *
 
 void pm_runtime_drop_link(struct device *dev)
 {
-	rpm_put_suppliers(dev);
-
 	spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
 	WARN_ON(dev->power.links_count == 0);
 	dev->power.links_count--;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ