[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1584296.eCrsGTMp5G@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 10:59:42 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI: EC: Make acpi_ec_dsdt_probe() more straightforward
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Since acpi_ec_dsdt_probe() returns early if boot_ec is set, it is
always unset when that function calls acpi_config_boot_ec() (passing
ec->handle as the handle argument to it). Thus it is not really
useful to call acpi_config_boot_ec() at that point. It is sufficient to
call acpi_ec_setup() directly and (if that is successful) set boot_ec,
so make acpi_ec_dsdt_probe() do that and avoid some pointless checks
in acpi_config_boot_ec().
No intentional functional impact except for a changed message.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/acpi/ec.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ec.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -1768,9 +1768,16 @@ void __init acpi_ec_dsdt_probe(void)
* At this point, the GPE is not fully initialized, so do not to
* handle the events.
*/
- ret = acpi_config_boot_ec(ec, ec->handle, false, false);
- if (ret)
+ ret = acpi_ec_setup(ec, false);
+ if (ret) {
acpi_ec_free(ec);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ boot_ec = ec;
+
+ acpi_handle_info(ec->handle,
+ "Boot DSDT EC used to handle transactions\n");
}
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists