[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190201150817.GB4973@dell>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 15:08:17 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mfd: intel-lpss: Move linux/pm.h to the local header
On Fri, 01 Feb 2019, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 11:50 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > > We now using a common macro for PM operations in Intel LPSS driver,
> > > and, since that macro relies on the definition and macro from linux/pm.h
> > > header file, it's logical to include it directly in intel-lpss.h.
> > > Otherwise it's a bit fragile and requires a proper ordering
> > > of header inclusion in C files.
> >
> > I don't agree with this. File which use various headers should
> > explicitly include them. Inheriting header files is non-optimal.
> >
>
> intel-lpss.h _is_ using pm.h.
> I don't see a contradiction here.
Then it should be including in there *also*.
My point is that if drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-{acpi,pci}.c use the header
file, it should include it explicitly.
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c | 1 -
> > > drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c | 1 -
> > > drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h | 2 ++
> > > 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
>
>
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists