linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] efi/arm: Don't expect a return value of ptdump_debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9tcpZvMZdbD0D+EUCTbdnszv3+MHM68utLZssuMcxyZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Feb 2019 23:18:22 +0100
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi/arm: Don't expect a return value of ptdump_debugfs_register

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 20:21, Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
>
> As of commit e2a2e56e4082 ("arm64: dump: no need to check return value
> of debugfs_create functions") in the arm64 for-next/core branch,
> ptdump_debugfs_register does not have a return value, which causes a
> build error here:
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c:51:9: error: returning 'void' from a
> function with incompatible result type 'int'
>         return ptdump_debugfs_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables");
>                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 1 error generated.
>
> The arm version is still awaiting acceptance [1] but in anticipation
> of that patch being merged, restructure this function to call
> ptdump_debugfs_register without expecting a return value.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190122144114.9816-3-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org/
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>

Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>


Catalin, Will,

Could you please apply this directly?

> ---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> index 23ea1ed409d1..7ae3b797caf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c
> @@ -45,10 +45,10 @@ static struct ptdump_info efi_ptdump_info = {
>
>  static int __init ptdump_init(void)
>  {
> -       if (!efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES))
> -               return 0;
> +       if (efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES))
> +               ptdump_debugfs_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables");
>
> -       return ptdump_debugfs_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables");
> +       return 0;
>  }
>  device_initcall(ptdump_init);
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>