linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Disable extra debugging info in .s output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNATVeX=6Mmn6A4+EGmZ9OSf=ePwbQWV1m1c=e=_LiebdNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 2 Feb 2019 22:48:00 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Disable extra debugging info in .s output

On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 12:12 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 08:58:13PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Variables assigned with ':=' are evaluated just on parsing Makefile.
> >
> > The scripts/Makefile.build is parsed over and over again,
> > so the compiler is invoked hundreds times to test these four options
> > even when you are not actually building any new objects.
> >
> > It is mitigated by replacing ':=' with '=',
> > but they are still evaluated multiple times when generating asm-offset.
>
> Now that you mention it, how about ?=

'?=' is the same as '=' here.




> disable_extra_cc_dbg ?= $(call cc-option,-gno-as-locview-support)
> disable_extra_cc_dbg += $(call cc-option,-fno-dwarf2-cfi-asm)
> disable_extra_cc_dbg += $(call cc-option,-feliminate-unused-debug-symbols)
> disable_extra_cc_dbg += $(call cc-option,-gno-statement-frontiers)
>
> With it, the slowdown of the incremental build is ~0.2s (on an old laptop):
>
> defconfig without:      9.6128 +- 0.0327 seconds time elapsed  ( +-  0.34% )
>
> vs
>
> defconfig with:         9.8483 +- 0.0273 seconds time elapsed  ( +-  0.28% )
>
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
>
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada